WLE Mekong
  • About Us
    • About us
      • Our objectives
      • Our team
      • Contact us
    • Our partners
        • Cambodian Partners
        • Chinese Partners
        • International Partners
        • Lao Partners
        • Myanmar Partners
        • Thai Partners
        • Vietnamese Partners
    • Close
  • Changes
    • Where We Work
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • View all projects
    • Our Work
      • Benefit-sharing
      • Catchments & Landuse
      • Gender & Diversity
      • Research for Development
      • River Food Systems
      • River Monitoring
      • Water Governance
      • Capacity Building & Professional Development
    • Our Research
      • Greater Mekong Dams Observatory
      • State of Knowledge Series
      • Water Knowledge Series
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
    • Close
  • Dialogue
    • Stories
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • Mekong Citizen
    • Greater Mekong Fora
      • 2018 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2017 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2016 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2015 Greater Mekong Forum
    • Close

Mekong Blog

  • Mekong River Basin

Why does International Rivers oppose hydropower development in the Lao PDR

  • Stories
  • Greater Mekong Forums
  • Mekong Citizen

Why does International Rivers oppose hydropower development in the Lao PDR

cpwf.mekongJuly 18, 2013Uncategorized, Vientiane Times

Vientiane Times, July 7, 2012

By opposing plans for sustainable hydropower development, the nongovernmental organisation International Rivers is working against the Lao people. As someone born and raised in Laos, I feel there is a need to refute this anti-development NGO’s claim that they are helping our cause.
International Rivers is a California-based organisation whose declared mission is to “protect rivers and defend the rights of communities.” According to its web site, “International Rivers works to stop destructive hydropower projects in Laos and advocates for the rights of communities affected by dams, such as Nam Theun 2, Theun-Hinboun, and the Theun-Hinboun Expansion Project.” I have been involved in social and environmental impact and resettlement programmes for power projects including Nam Theun 2, and I know for a fact that many more people have been helped than harmed by the resettlement process.
Now International Rivers is stepping up opposition to the Xayaboury Hydropower Project and the proposed Don Sahong project in the south. Many Lao people question why International Rivers is trying to derail hydropower development that will bring huge foreign capital vital for the country’s poverty eradication programme.
Everybody knows that hydropower is a clean, green form of energy that brings direct and indirect benefits to our people. By stopping development, International Rivers would be robbing us of the opportunity to give our people better health, better education and better living conditions.
Dams are not going to kill us. In many ways, dams will protect us from socio-economic insecurity and give us the resources to look after ourselves. Without foreign cash from the sale of hydropower, how could the Lao government afford foreign expertise to train our people to farm better, to fish better, to look after our natural resources better, and secure economic opportunities for a better future? After all our government intends to meet its MDGs and get out of Least Developed Nation status by 2020.
Ever since Laos announced plans to tap the powerproducing potential of the Mekong, International Rivers has maintained the Xayaboury dam would block fish migration as well as the flow of sediments and nutrients, affecting agriculture and threatening the lives of 60 million people downstream as far as the Mekong Delta. This kind of exaggerated claim shows they are willing to ay anything and blame dams for everything.
In my village, in Nongbok district, Khammuan province, we have lost over 200 metres of land through riverbank erosion over the past 60 years. I hope with the earnings from hydro development the bank erosion in my village and others can be stopped. While International Rivers claims to help dam-affected people, it is clear that they only focus on those who mourn what they left behind. They never show the positive benefits such as new homes, better land for farming and livelihood training provided as part of resettlement requirements. If International Rivers succeeds in its irresponsible campaign to stop all hydropower projects, poor Lao people will be deprived of these benefits.
It would be very sad if our people did not get new schools and clinics; if they did not get new roads and bridges and new opportunities. It would be very sad if they do not get a chance to improve their lives and the lives of their children.
Chareun Sayakoummane is a resident of Ban Sokpaluang who works for a local registered company called Chareun & Associates, of which he is a founder. The core business of the company is social and environmental impact assessments for hydro projects throughout Laos.
Previous
Story
Next
Story

Related Stories

  • mekong
    May 2, 2013
    JICA begins survey for Champassak dam
  • mekong
    June 3, 2014
    Hydropower potential attracts IFC to invest
  • mekong
    October 8, 2014
    "Mekong - The Movie" to be screened at 14th International Film Festival on Energy
  • mekong
    February 20, 2014
    Xayaboury dam construction not delayed by flooding
  • mekong
    March 21, 2014
    Tonle Sap Lake fisheries a concern for dam project
  • mekong
    October 14, 2012
    Govt promotes investment in small-scale hydropower
  • mekong
    March 10, 2015
    Laos Faces Pressure to Stall Decision on Lower Mekong River Dam
  • mekong
    October 26, 2015
    Study on the Impacts of Mainstream Hydropower on the Mekong River
  • mekong
    April 28, 2015
    Nam Khan 2 power plant readies for generation
  • mekong
    February 5, 2015
    China and Europe may drive a new solar chapter
  • mekong
    September 16, 2014
    Cambodia's River Coalition in Cambodia calls upon government to protect the Mekong River
  • mekong
    February 24, 2014
    Hydropower has future potential in national development
  • mekong
    February 1, 2015
    Thailand Slips Into Deflation on Falling Energy Prices
  • mekong
    September 11, 2013
    Xayaboury dam ‘not harming the Mekong', Thai reporters told
  • mekong
    October 27, 2012
    Water resources to be preserved for hydropower
  • mekong
    February 4, 2015
    Hydropower major revenue earner for the country
  • mekong
    February 5, 2015
    Energy tycoon Li Hejun ousts Jack Ma as China's richest man
  • mekong
    August 25, 2013
    Species under threat at Ramsar wetlands site
  • mekong
    May 15, 2014
    Laos to reach 7,000MW by 2016
  • mekong
    March 7, 2013
    Denying green development is deplorable: hydropower helps us all

The sustainable development of the Greater Mekong depends on the fair and equitable governance of its water.

ABOUT WLE

  • Our objectives
  • Our team
  • Our partners
  • Terms of use
  • Newsletters
  • Contact us

CO-SUPPORTED BY

WLE Greater Mekong is funded in part by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

Water, Land & Ecosystems Mekong - footer logos
© All rights reserved - WLE CGIAR
Subscribe to our newsletter SIGN UP
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy