WLE Mekong
  • About Us
    • About us
      • Our objectives
      • Our team
      • Contact us
    • Our partners
        • Cambodian Partners
        • Chinese Partners
        • International Partners
        • Lao Partners
        • Myanmar Partners
        • Thai Partners
        • Vietnamese Partners
    • Close
  • Changes
    • Where We Work
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • View all projects
    • Our Work
      • Benefit-sharing
      • Catchments & Landuse
      • Gender & Diversity
      • Research for Development
      • River Food Systems
      • River Monitoring
      • Water Governance
      • Capacity Building & Professional Development
    • Our Research
      • Greater Mekong Dams Observatory
      • State of Knowledge Series
      • Water Knowledge Series
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
    • Close
  • Dialogue
    • Stories
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • Mekong Citizen
    • Greater Mekong Fora
      • 2018 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2017 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2016 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2015 Greater Mekong Forum
    • Close

Mekong Blog

  • Mekong River Basin

Govt details action under Mekong Agreement

  • Stories
  • Greater Mekong Forums
  • Mekong Citizen

Govt details action under Mekong Agreement

cpwf.mekongFebruary 12, 2013Uncategorized, Vientiane Times

Vientiane Times, February 04, 2013

Laos met the requirements of the 1995 Mekong Agreement before making the decision to start construction of the Xayaboury hydropower project on the Mekong mainstream, a top government official has said.

“Environmental activists continue to assert that Laos violated the Mekong Agreement in regards to the Xayaboury project, but we have fully complied with all the rules and satisfied the immediate concerns of our neighbours,” Lao National Mekong Committee Vice Chairman Mr Viraphonh Viravong said in an exclusive interview with Vientiane Times.

The 1995 Mekong Agreement on the Cooperation for the Sustainable Development of the Mekong River Basin does not require a government to reach consensus with other governments as to whether a project will proceed, Mr Viraphonh said.

The carefully formulated procedures of the Mekong River Commission (MRC), aimed at resolving any difference or dispute between two or more parties, required Laos to undertake prior consultation, which it did. The MRC itself supervised the prior consultation process – the first in its history.

“Our understanding, based on what respected international law firms have advised, is that the process requires only consultation, not agreement,” stressed Mr Viraphonh, who is Laos’ Deputy Minister of Energy and Mines.

“In claiming that Laos did not reach agreement with its neighbours, environmental activists have misunderstood or misstated the intent of the prior consultation process,” he said. “We wonder why they continue to stir controversy when the member countries themselves are not opposed to sustainable development along the mainstream.”

Among the guiding principles of the MRC procedures is respect for “sovereign equality and territory integrity”. Each riparian country that wants to use water may do so if it consults other riparian members before taking any action on the Mekong mainstream. The 1995 Agreement states clearly that the prior consultation process does not include the right to veto the use of water.

“Laos has been called out for not providing other governments with an opportunity to evaluate the project’s transboundary impacts, yet we have done so,” the Deputy Minister said.

After reviewing the extensive information provided under the consultation process, Thailand, Vietnam and Cambodia raised certain questions, to which Laos responded with additional information, he said.

In fact, Laos submitted extensive information to the MRC Secretariat for distribution to member countries, and under the terms of the consultation process those countries had an exten ded period in which to raise questions, argue, and seek further information – which they did.

During the process, the Lao government engaged in its own form of shuttle diplomacy, responding to and answering every inquiry it received through the MRC Secretariat or from member countries, providing further information – and ultimately making costly changes to the project’s design.

Acting responsibly, Laos engaged Pöyry AG, an internationally renowned consulting firm, which performed an exhaustive study of the project; recommended changes, which Laos agreed to implement; and concluded that with those changes, the project had negligible transboundary impact.

Not yet done, Laos hired another acclaimed consulting firm, Compagnie Nationale du Rhône, and it, too, gave the green light to the project.

The Deputy Minister noted that if other countries were not satisfied with Laos’ cooperation and response by now, they could have asked for the moratorium of the Xayaboury project during the meeting in Luang Prabang, but they did not.

Mr Viraphonh added: “Having satisfied requests from our neighbours and all MRC requirements, we are proceeding with sustainable, environmentally sound hydropower development. The government of Laos has the right to act in the best interests of its people.”

Previous
Story
Next
Story

Related Stories

  • mekong
    January 19, 2016
    Impressions from a study trip to Laos - Le Phuoc Thao
    River Food Systems
  • mekong
    March 27, 2013
    IFC backs Lao hydropower development policy
  • mekong
    March 10, 2015
    Cambodia PM says work on mega-dam will not start until 2018
  • mekong
    February 12, 2013
    Nam Lik 1 power dam construction to begin soon
  • mekong
    October 14, 2012
    Officials set plans for energy consumption
    Water Governance
  • mekong
    October 27, 2012
    Water resources to be preserved for hydropower
  • mekong
    June 20, 2018
    Science-policy collaboration: an appealing way to tackle pollution from bananas
    Water Governance
  • mekong
    February 4, 2015
    Public consultations for Don Sahong dam commence
  • mekong
    January 22, 2013
    Laos losing land due to erosion
  • mekong
    April 24, 2014
    Many power plants coming online in Laos
  • mekong
    November 16, 2013
    Laos seeks to pacify neighbours over Don Sahong dam
  • mekong
    April 23, 2014
    Nam Ngum 5 provides assistance to affected villagers
  • mekong
    August 25, 2013
    Govt demonstrates transparency over Xayaboury dam
  • mekong
    January 8, 2013
    Feasibility study underway on new Nam Theun II dam watergate
  • mekong
    July 23, 2013
    It's Not So Different in Attapeu
  • mekong
    August 13, 2012
    Water, Food and Energy: nexus or Lexus? A back-of-envelope analysis
    Research for Development
  • mekong
    February 4, 2015
    Upstream development alters Mekong water levels
  • mekong
    June 26, 2014
    Laos Agrees to More Scrutiny on Mekong Dam After Calls for Delay
  • mekong red
    April 26, 2016
    Small is worrying: tributaries, ‘small’ hydro and the Mekong hydropower debate
    Water Governance
  • mekong
    February 5, 2015
    China and Europe may drive a new solar chapter

The sustainable development of the Greater Mekong depends on the fair and equitable governance of its water.

ABOUT WLE

  • Our objectives
  • Our team
  • Our partners
  • Terms of use
  • Newsletters
  • Contact us

CO-SUPPORTED BY

WLE Greater Mekong is funded in part by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

Water, Land & Ecosystems Mekong - footer logos
© All rights reserved - WLE CGIAR
Subscribe to our newsletter SIGN UP
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy