WLE Mekong
  • About Us
    • About us
      • Our objectives
      • Our team
      • Contact us
    • Our partners
        • Cambodian Partners
        • Chinese Partners
        • International Partners
        • Lao Partners
        • Myanmar Partners
        • Thai Partners
        • Vietnamese Partners
    • Close
  • Changes
    • Where We Work
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • View all projects
    • Our Work
      • Benefit-sharing
      • Catchments & Landuse
      • Gender & Diversity
      • Research for Development
      • River Food Systems
      • River Monitoring
      • Water Governance
      • Capacity Building & Professional Development
    • Our Research
      • Greater Mekong Dams Observatory
      • State of Knowledge Series
      • Water Knowledge Series
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
    • Close
  • Dialogue
    • Stories
      • Irrawaddy River Basin
      • Mekong River Basin
      • Red River Basin
      • Salween River Basin
      • Mekong Citizen
    • Greater Mekong Fora
      • 2018 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2017 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2016 Greater Mekong Forum
      • 2015 Greater Mekong Forum
    • Close

Mekong Blog

  • Mekong River Basin

Courage and the Psychology of Writing

  • Stories
  • Greater Mekong Forums
  • Mekong Citizen

Courage and the Psychology of Writing

TerryClaytonNovember 11, 2013Mekong Blog, Mekong River Basin

An M-Power Fellows Writing Synthesis Workshop offers up some surprising insights into the writing process.

Forty-six young men and women from five countries. Young researchers working to build a career in academia, government research institutions and NGOs. Giving up a weekend to spend time in Bangkok working on research reports funded by the Australian aid program and managed through the Challenge Program on Water and Food, the Asian Institute of Technology, Ubon Ratchathani Rajabhat University and Yunnan University. I am here with other colleagues to mentor.

There are more relaxing ways to spend a weekend, but few as intellectually stimulating. Writing is a complex cognitive process I find endlessly fascinating and the subject of renewed interest among psychologists and neuroscientists. Part of my motivation in attending the M-POWER (www.mpowernetwork.org) Writing Synthesis Workshop 26-27 October was to identify topics for my own research on the psychology of writing. The insight these young researchers offered up was not something we often think about: it takes courage to write.

Writing requires courage in different forms.

The courage of commitment

Writing is one of the most demanding mental tasks we can undertake. To embark on writing a policy brief, a working paper, a journal article, is to commit to weeks often months of mental toil. Few people have the luxury of being able to dedicate their time to only one task and must juggle the demands of writing with professional commitments and time for family and friends. The process is not only time consuming but emotionally and intellectually demanding. It takes courage to make the commitment required to bring a manuscript to completion.

The courage to put your private thoughts into the public sphere

Writing is seen as a reflection of the quality and sophistication of your thinking. People who write well are seen as people who think well. When we present our ideas is a published document, we are opening ourselves to praise and criticism. Praise is nice, but people may not understand our ideas. They may not agree with our representation of a particularly reality. Editors can be scathing in their reviews and our ideas may even anger some people. It takes courage to open the contents of your mind to others.

The courage to grow

Good writing is a process of knowledge transformation. I start with a jumble of thoughts based on the information I have acquired through the labor of research, reading, getting feedback from friends and colleagues, and in the process my own ideas change. New ideas emerge. My own understanding of the issue or the problem is changed, sometimes radically. To learn is to change not just the contents of my own mind but my attitudes and beliefs, and that requires courage.

The courage to seek Truth

An open society puts a high value on truth, and since truthfulness is the hallmark of science, a reciprocal link is forged between science and civil society. By supporting and encouraging one, we support and encourage the other. The culture of science and research is characterized by critical thinking, systematic enquiry and skepticism toward unfounded claims. Thus, an open society is one where citizens engage in rational discussions and debates on civic matters. This is the ideal.

The reality is, as always, somewhat different. Researchers are constrained by the internal politics of the institutions in which they work and by the political ideology within which those institutions are situated. Certain topics are considered off limits and results may be suppressed if they contradict or challenge the dominant discourse. It takes courage to seek Truth.

Courage and writing

Some readers may feel I am overstating the case, but courage and writing are old friends. Think journalism. According to the Committee to Protect Journalists, in 2012, 73 reporters were murdered, caught in combat crossfire or killed while on dangerous assignments. The Canadian Journalists for Free Expression has an annual dinner to honor courageous reporting.

Novelists too show courage. Jane Austen, Mary Shelley, George Sand, Charlotte Brontë, Harriet Beecher Stowe, Harriet Wilson, Louisa May Alcott, and Kate Chopin secured their place in history for their representations of injustice and unconventional heroines. When Abraham Lincoln met Harriet Beecher Stowe, author of Uncle Tom’s Cabin, he is reported to have said, “So you’re the little lady who started this great [civil] war.”

Science also has its writing heroes. It took considerable courage on the part of Charles Darwin to publish “On the Origin of Species” in the deeply conservative England of 1859. Along with the Church he was challenging the fundamental beliefs of an entire generation. More recently, Richard Dawkins stirred up no small amount of animosity among his peers when he published “The Selfish Gene” in 1976. His ‘gene-centered’ view of evolution challenged deeply entrenched prevailing views.

Courage, it seems, is not an abstract emotion but has a seat in the brain. Neuroscience researchers recently reported they have found that a part of the brain called the subgenual anterior cingulate cortex (sgACC) becomes activated when people do something courageous. Perhaps that means someday we may have a pill that will give us the courage to keep on writing. For some reason, I hope not.

Looking around the room, I don’t think any of my young colleagues are quite ready to shock the world or put their lives or careers on the line just yet. Nonetheless, by taking up the pen (or the keyboard) they have started down a path that may well lead them to a place where great courage is required. I won’t be surprised when they do.

 

 

 

Previous
Story
Next
Story

Related Stories

  • mekong
    February 2, 2015
    World Bank and International Hydropower Association to promote sustainable hydropower ...
  • mekong
    February 20, 2013
    Study sets Xayaboury irrigation scheme back on track
  • mekong
    January 19, 2014
    Govt reiterates stance on Don Sahong Dam project
  • mekong
    May 14, 2013
    Learning by Seeing
  • mekong
    December 30, 2012
    Xayaboury project differs from other dams
  • mekong
    February 2, 2015
    Burma puts the brakes on resource exports to China
  • mekong
    January 19, 2016
    Impressions from a study trip to Laos – Truong Thi Luu
  • mekong
    October 27, 2017
    Sustainable Water Resources Development in the Mekong River Basin - Context and Challenges
    Water Governance
  • mekong
    July 11, 2013
    Feasibility study begins on Nam Theun 4 dam in Laos
  • mekong
    February 12, 2013
    Govt pledges to release Xayaboury dam design data
  • mekong
    September 14, 2012
    Electricity to triple Lao exports to Thailand in 2015
  • mekong
    February 5, 2015
    China to Merge Power Firms as Nuclear Ambition Grows
  • mekong
    July 18, 2013
    Why does International Rivers oppose hydropower development in the Lao PDR
  • mekong
    June 13, 2013
    Natural resources could pay for nationwide primary education: Report
  • mekong
    November 1, 2012
    Water Wars over Mekong Dams an Unlikely Future
  • mekong
    September 14, 2012
    Study approved for new Nam Theun II dam water gate
  • mekong red
    April 26, 2016
    Small is worrying: tributaries, ‘small’ hydro and the Mekong hydropower debate
    Water Governance
  • mekong
    February 4, 2015
    Upstream development alters Mekong water levels
  • mekong
    May 2, 2013
    JICA begins survey for Champassak dam
  • mekong
    June 3, 2014
    Nam Phak hydropower project under study in Oudomxay

The sustainable development of the Greater Mekong depends on the fair and equitable governance of its water.

ABOUT WLE

  • Our objectives
  • Our team
  • Our partners
  • Terms of use
  • Newsletters
  • Contact us

CO-SUPPORTED BY

WLE Greater Mekong is funded in part by the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT).

Water, Land & Ecosystems Mekong - footer logos
© All rights reserved - WLE CGIAR
Subscribe to our newsletter SIGN UP
We use cookies to ensure that we give you the best experience on our website. If you continue to use this site we will assume that you are happy with it.OkPrivacy policy